Ixekizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a real-world clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety reports of ixekizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis may vary between clinical trials and real-world studies. AIM: To analyze the real-world data of ixekizumab therapy to evaluate its efficacy and safety and highlight the factors influencing the treatment response in the real-world scenario. PATIENTS/METHODS: Data of 82 adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis are included in this study. Psoriasis area severity index (PASI) 75/90/100 responses at 4, 16, 24, and 48 weeks were analyzed retrospectively from patient charts by examining demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, especially their previous biologic experience, obesity, and involvement of hard-to-treat areas. RESULTS: PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 responses were achieved in 92.4%, 86.1%, and 26.6% patients at week 16 and maintained till week 48 in 92.3%, 86.5%, and 17.3% patients. PASI90 responses in obese patients were significantly lower than non-obese patients at week 4 (33.3% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.042), but this difference was minimized by week 16 (82.4% vs. 90%, p = 0.405). PASI90 responses in biologic-naive patients were significantly higher than biologic-experienced patients at week 16 (p = 0.015). Involvement of hard-to-treat areas was negatively associated with PASI90 responses at week 16 (OR: 1591805.842; 95% CI: 1.223-2071404486740.201; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab provides an effective and safe biologic treatment option to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Obesity, though it affects the early treatment response (till week 4), does not upset the overall treatment response beyond week 16. Previous biologic exposure and involvement of hard-to-treat areas are important prognostic factors for achieving high PASI responses in psoriatic patients.

Evaluation of patients with telogen effluvium during the pandemic: May the monocytes be responsible for post COVID-19 telogen effluvium?

INTRODUCTION: Telogen effluvium (TE) is one of the causes of non-scarring hair loss that occurred commonly 2-3 months after a triggering factor. It was reported that the incidence of TE increased during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. However, to date, there is no study evaluating the status of COVID-19 before the onset of hair loss in patients with TE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the patients with TE whether they had COVID-19 or not before the onset of their hair loss and to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of those with and without a history of COVID-19. METHOD: We conducted an observational cohort study of TE patients. The diagnosis of TE depended on anamnesis and physical examination of the patients. Also, hair pull test was performed. Demographic data and the results of COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were recorded from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Totally, 181 patients with TE were included in the study. Sixty-four of patients (35.4%) had been diagnosed with COVID-19 before the hair loss started. The median duration of development of hair loss was 2 months (range 1-11 months, IQR 3) after COVID-19 diagnosis. In this group, 87.5% of patients (n = 56) had acute TE and 12.5% of patients (n = 8) had chronic TE. The rate of acute TE and the use of vitamin supplements were ignificantly higher (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively) and the monocyte count in peripheral blood was lower (p = 0.041) in the group diagnosed with COVID-19. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It was stated that monocytes and macrophages infected by SARS-CoV-2 can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines that play a crucial role in the development of COVID-19-related complications. Also, it was suggested that the number of monocytes tends to be lower in the late recovery stage. The lower monocyte count in patients with a history of COVID-19 in our study may be related to evaluating the patients in the late period of recovery and the migration of circulating monocytes to hair follicles. The history of COVID-19 must be questioned in patients with TE. It should be kept in mind that hair loss that develops after COVID-19 may be presented as chronic TE form too. The exact mechanisms of hair loss induced by COVID-19 are not fully explained; the roles of monocytes on the hair follicles may be one of the responsible mechanisms.

Retrospective evaluation of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria using omalizumab during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Omalizumab (OMZ) is a monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody used in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The data about using OMZ during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the status of having COVID-19 and relationships between COVID-19, vaccination, and urticaria symptoms of CSU patients on OMZ. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 36 adult CSU patients treated with OMZ. Demographic data, the results of COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and vaccination status were recorded from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients, 23 women, and 13 men were evaluated. The mean age was 45.81 years. Two patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 while using OMZ. Four patients interrupted their OMZ treatment during the pandemic, and OMZ treatments were restarted in all patients. There were 28 patients who had at least one dose of vaccine (inactive and/or mRNA vaccine). Only one patient had an urticaria exacerbation after the first dose of mRNA vaccine. CONCLUSION: As a result, our findings have shown that omalizumab treatment in CSU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic does not increase the risk of COVID-19 infection and omalizumab can be used safely.